[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad change to tooltip.el
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: bad change to tooltip.el |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:36:09 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Of course, once CL has been required for compilation then all the
>> following lisp files are compiled with those macros, and not those in
>> subr.el which have been overwritten.
>
> It doesn't seem to make much difference if any,
If you mean the effect of using the cl versions of push and pop,
surely they expand to the same code as correct calls of the normal
versions.
- bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/11
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/11
- bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/11
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/11
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el,
Dave Love <=
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/12
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/12
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/15
Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/16