[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad change to tooltip.el
From: |
Stefan |
Subject: |
Re: bad change to tooltip.el |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:40:46 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) |
>> Not that I am aware of. I just seems bad practice to have two
>> macros with the same name. If, as Stefan suggests, it doesn't make
>> much difference, where is the benefit?
>>
>> The question is undefined until you specify an alternative
>> to compare against.
> The alternative was implicit: delete those functions in the CL files which
> already exist in subr.el or C source.
No: they offer extra features, such as
(push 1 (cdr x)) ==> (setcdr x (cons 1 (cdr x)))
Stefan
Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/19