Re: bad change to tooltip.el

[Dave Love]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     I know, but I think the better solution is that in
>     byte-compile-callargs-warn, instead of using fboundp, we should track the
>     function name through load-history and things like that to see whether it
>     will be available at runtime, given the set of requires specified in
>     the file.
>
> Would someone like to try implementing this?

Wouldn't it be better first to work on checking for and fixing
problems that are shown up by warnings now (including reducing the
noise)?  E.g. the cperl problem with imenu gives a compiler warning.
Producing more warnings won't help when they're ignored anyway.