[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad change to tooltip.el
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: bad change to tooltip.el |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:52:07 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not sure what's the reason, but I know that I'd oppose any such change
> because the speed difference is much too large.
The overhead of starting a clean Emacs is ~0.6s on a P200, and a
fraction of the typical compilation time for a file as far as I can
tell.
> I always use `make recompile' and it works just fine.
It's clear it masks errors, at least. I've fixed many in Gnus and
W3/url in particular that showed up when not compiling everything
together.
> I'd rather fix the byte-compiler to behave better with `make
> recompile'
I don't think it's a compiler problem if required files mask missing
functions.
I guess this is moot as long as compiler warnings are ignored as
widely as they appear to be :-(.
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, (continued)
Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el,
Dave Love <=
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/19
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/20
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/22
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/22
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/22