Re: [Erc-discuss] /list produces incomplete output: analysis and workaround

[Aaron S. Hawley]

On 5/16/12, Sascha Wilde <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Aaron S. Hawley" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The other option is making sure the handlers of erc-list.el get first
>> priority by not appending them with third argument to `add-hook'.
>
> I thought of that, too.  But this change would change the semantics
> further (not sure whether this would be intended): as
> erc-list-handle-322 ends with:
>
>   ;; Don't let another hook run.
>   t)
>
> erc-server-322 wouldn't be run at all...
>
> I have no idea if that would be good or bad as I don't really understand
> what the rational of erc-server-322 is anyway?!

Seems not letting another hook run is exactly what is intended.  Like
you I'm skeptical.