Re: [fluid-dev] OS X build

[Ebrahim Mayat]

On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Sven Meier wrote:

> BTW why is it that the resulting shared library is named  
> "Fluidsynth"? Wouldn't libfluidsynth.dylib be more appropriate?

Sven

Many thanks for your testing earlier.

If you build with the enable-framework option you will build an OS X  
framework in which the shared library does not have the .dylib  
extension  by convention. See
<http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/OSX_Technology_Overview/SystemFrameworks/SystemFrameworks.html 
>

If you disable the enable-framework option, then you should get the  
*.dylib library.

Regards,
Ebrahim