[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and
Re: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:13:54 +0200 (CEST)
> Okay - but I suggest that we need (or is there already?) a macro to
> prevent compilation of these large tables, which are about 60K in
> size, when they are not needed.
Hmm, shouldn't a compiler simply ignore it in case it isn't needed? I
can't imagine that such an optimization is left out...