[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:44:47 -0400 |
>>>> Looking more, looks like both TrueType and Type 1 / CFF use non-zero
>>>> winding
>>>> rule. (I'm relieved!)
>> There is common 'fill' and less common 'eofill' in Postscript.
>
> Right. But the question was about Type1 and CFF font formats, not Postscript
> itself. Thanks to Dave Lemon, we now know that Postscript-flavored fonts
> leave the winding rule unspecified...
It escapes me why the even-odd rule would ever be desirable. The XOR like
overlap of otherwise correct shapes (without self-crossing in proper
orientation) is weird in our context. Such overlap is lesser of the three
errors.
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/06/01
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Sascha Brawer, 2015/06/03
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/06/03
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/06/04
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/06/04
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/06/04
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/06/04
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/06/04
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/06/04
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov <=
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Dave Arnold, 2015/06/04
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/06/08
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Dave Arnold, 2015/06/22
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/06/26
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/06/26
- Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Dave Arnold, 2015/06/26
Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/06/04