[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working

From: Dave Arnold
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:36:57 +0000

I agree that changing just the fill rule would not change the results. There 
are other differences, though I do not know what they all are. (This was way 
before my time at Adobe.) 

Other differences include at least dropout and collision control heuristics.


From: Behdad Esfahbod <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 11:17 PM
To: Werner LEMBERG; Dave Arnold
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working

On 15-06-25 10:55 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> > The threshold is 400 ppem. Below that size, a "center scan"
>> > algorithm is used.  It is a newer algorithm than the original scan
>> > converter and produces better results.
> Please define `better results'.  I've always thought that either rule
> yields a non-ambiguous result...

I read Dave's response as "the new algorithm produces better results at these
sizes, and this algorithm happens to use XXX fill rule..."

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]