[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:23:36 +0200 (CEST) |
> Excuse me, what is the purpose of the sample texts
> in ftview/ftstring? [...]
I believe you are thinking too complicated :-) As far as I can see,
Alexei wants to improve the results of key `5' in ftview, which
currently only shows the `brown fox' pangram, plus some other
characters. It would be an improvement if you could switch between a
set of available pangrams so that you have some `real' text for
non-latin scripts also.
Werner
- [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/19
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/23
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Khaled Hosny, 2016/09/23
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/24
- Message not available
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, suzuki toshiya, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/25
- Message not available
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, suzuki toshiya, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/24