[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64 |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:32:27 -0400 |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:14 PM Hin-Tak Leung
<address@hidden> wrote:
> - FT_Alloc_Func and FT_Realloc_Func have "long" in the headers but have
> FT_Long in the implementation of the debug pairs. (the normal pair have
> "long"). Some consistency would be good. I tried changing the header to
> FT_Long (and redefining FT_Long to 64-bit) but unfortunately the public
> header does not include the FT_Long definition in inttypes.h and it gets
> rather ugly when different part of FreeType thinks of FT_Long with different
> sizes... Those functions need a 64-bit type in the prototype, and neither
> "long" nor "FT_Long" are currently 64-bit on win64.
Indeed, size_t is the correct C89-compliant type. Would it hurt to
modify FT_Alloc_Func and FT_Realloc_Func?
- [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Hin-Tak Leung, 2018/09/11
- Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2018/09/14
- Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/09/16
- Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2018/09/26
- Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/09/27
- Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2018/09/27
- Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/09/28
Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/09/16