Re: [Fsfe-uk] Explanation of Tivosiation and problems - comments sought

[Ciaran O'Riordan]

Alex Hudson <address@hidden> writes:
> if you're supplying firewalls to
> people, and the firewalls are meddle-proof (which IMHO is a feature, in
> this instance), you'd be more or less forced to provide per-user
> binaries signed with different keys in order to comply (as I understand
> it, anyway), which is a bit of a burden. I suppose there are likely
> other technological solutions to that problem, though.

It is a trivial burden because it's automate-able.  Also we're only talking
about hardware manufacturers - people who have accepted the much bigger
burden of making a physical device.


-- 
Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3
http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \  GPLv3 and other work supported by
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \   Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org