ghm-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy


From: Garreau\, Alexandre
Subject: Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 05:04:07 +0200
User-agent: Gnus (5.13), GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

On 2014-08-11 at 19:37, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> From http://www.gnu.org/ghm/policy.html:
>
>    "Offensive or overly explicit sexual language or imagery is
>     inappropriate during the event, including presentations.
>
>     Participants violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled
>     from the meeting at the discretion of the organizers.
>
>     Harassment includes offensive comments related to gender, sexual
>     orientation, disability, appearance, body size, race, religion,
>     sexual images in public spaces, deliberate intimidation, stalking,
>     harassing photography or recording, persistent disruption of talks
>     or other events, repeated unsolicited physical contact, or sexual
>     attention."
>     
> Since I do not desire to be dennounced, prosecuted and finally
> sanctioned or expelled from the event (especially considering the
> physical pain and inconvenience of attending due to my very recent
> accident) I withdraw my intention to lecture "Introducing GNU Posh" at
> the GHM, as it is not compliant with the policy described in the page
> above.

Oh… is your talk essentially linked to that? Can’t you modify it? …or is
GNU Posh specifically bound to some offensive comments related to
gender, sexual orientation, disability, appearance (well… not so
terrible…), body size, race, religion (erm…)? to
sexuality/intimidation/stalking?

> PS: for those interested, I may perform the talk off-event in case we
> find a suitable place, we will see..

Well I’d find better to directly see a talk which isn’t based on human
discrimination/offense/aggression rather than still having a potentially
nasty thing happening elsewhere… What do you think of that?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]