Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Another tex package (texlive-base) to hack

[Sam Geeraerts]

Benedikt Ahrens schreef:
> > I see.
> > Then I think we can leave it where it is. I still think we should
> > include an updated licence file for it though; and a reference back to
> > this discussion. Thoughts on that?
> > kk
>
> You might want to reply to the AMS. They promised to deliver an updated
> license text, in case we ask them for it.
> I am not sure whether it is the latest version of the AMS packages that
> are shipped with gNS. If not, AMS should also change the license of the
> older versions.
> I can do that next week, but not any sooner.

If I understood correctly, the new license will only apply to future 
versions. Maybe they can be persuaded to do a UC Berkeley style license 
change if we ask nicely. If not, we can still include a notice that 
explains the situation and includes the future license.