[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] (UPDATED) Partial patch to gen-kernel
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] (UPDATED) Partial patch to gen-kernel |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:59:25 +0930 |
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:51:35 +0200
Sam Geeraerts <address@hidden> wrote:
> Karl Goetz schreef:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:14:38 +0930
> > Karl Goetz <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Attached is a partial patch to modify gen-kernel.
> >> It should fix the following bugs:
> >>
> >> http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00212
> >> - DeltaH - Kernel - non free licence /include/video/mach64
> >> http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00308
> >> - b43 kernel module suggests installation of proprietary firmware
> >>
> >
> > II: Checking modules for 386... reading new modules...read 1936
> > modules.
> > reading old modules...
> > MISS: atyfb
> > read 1937 modules : new(0) missing(1)
> > EE: Missing modules (start begging for mercy)
> > make: *** [module-check-386] Error 1
> > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules binary gave error exit
> > status 2
>
> I've not tried the patch myself (yet) and digging around in
> linux-2.6.24/debian didn't clarify much. But I think there's an error
> in your patch: you add the lines after "cd ..", so I think that they
> all fail. Although I don't see how this would create differences
> between old and new modules.
I didn't see that cd, but I've moved the code and I'm rebuilding - I've
not made any progress for 4 days, so I'm happy with any suggestion that
feels like progress :)
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature