[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] support for the fuloong 2f
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] support for the fuloong 2f |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:14:50 +0930 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:43:59 +0200
Ferdinand Hauck <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:47:39AM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > > I've compiled the linux-2.6.27.7-libre kernel for my Fuloong, this
> > > works well together with the Gnewsense metad distribution. The
> > > differences between the configurations is available here:
> > >
> > > http://www.lysator.liu.se/~crono/config.diff
> >
> > What are the diffs taken between, if not our metad kernel? Linux
> > libre upstream builds?
>
> That is the difference between the kernel configuration files
> (.config), not the kernel source itself (admittedly my previous post
So far I'm with you.
> was not very clear on that). However, I use different options than
> what is used for the kernel binary included in metad. The diff might
> nevertheless be useful to indicate which settings needs to be changed
> when building a kernel for the Fuloong, even though this is rather
> straightforward.
This left me confused.
My question: has the configuration file contents changed between metad
and what you diffed? (the options themselves, not what they are set to).
> The kernel source package included in metad was used without changes.
> This is why I believe it would be worth the effort to support the
> Fuloong as well.
This makes me suspect they have not changed, so that makes life a
little easier ;)
kk
> Best,
> Ferdinand
>
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature