gnewsense-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: Tying together the network-manager work


From: Ziro
Subject: Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: Tying together the network-manager work
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:32:07 +0900
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

At Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:04:44 +1030,
Karl Goetz wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:14:06 -0500
> Daniel Clark <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Karl Goetz wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:02:15 -0500
> > > Brett Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> I just did a fresh install of metad on a Yeeloong to make sure I
> > >> was right about where things stood as far as fixing the bugs that
> > >> seem to be high-priority and things like that.
> > >>
> > >> One thing that surprised me is that the machine did not install
> > >> network-manager 0.7 -- even after explicitly updating and trying to
> > >> dist-upgrade.  (/etc/network/interfaces still listed eth0, too, but
> > >> maybe that's a side effect of the bigger problem.)
> > > 
> > > Its a bug. For example:
> > > https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?28753
> > 
> > I think what Brett is running into is probably 0.7.2 packages / index
> > being borked in the archives - at least that was the case last week on
> > rms' machine (I still have no yeeloong, but hopefully will have a ETA
> > for a crapload of hardware - 25 yeeloongs, 10 fuloongs - early this
> > week when people at Lemote get back from Spring Festival).
> 
> GL getting yourself one soon.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Brett - were you seeing something like this?
> > 
> > W: Failed to fetch
> > http://us.archive.gnewsense.org/gnewsense-metad/gnewsense/pool/overlays/buildd/libnm-util1_0.7.2-2~bpo50+1_mipsel.deb
> >   Size mismatch
> 
> [...]
> 
> > W: Failed to fetch
> > http://us.archive.gnewsense.org/gnewsense-metad/gnewsense/pool/overlays/buildd/network-manager-dev_0.7.2-2~bpo50+1_mipsel.deb
> >   Size mismatch
> 
> These mismatches should have been fixed last night, can someone confirm?
> kk

I confirmed those problems had been fixed.  My yeeloong is not freshly 
installed one, though.
-- 
Ziro <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]