Re: Quirk with on_sms callback

[Pawel Kot]

Hi,

On 1/4/07, Jeremy Lainé <address@hidden> wrote:
> I noticed that unlike the call_notification callback (set by
> GN_OP_SetCallNotification), the prototype for the on_sms callback (set
> by GN_OP_OnSMS) does not have a pointer to the gn_statemachine that
> generated the event.
>
> This is problematic because it means that when the callback is
> triggered, you have no way of identifying what gn_statemachine
> triggered it. What are your thoughts on changing this?

Although we didn't need it so far it makes sense.

take care,
pkot
--
Pawel Kot