[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

archive registration (was: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2)

From: Doran Moppert
Subject: archive registration (was: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:33:00 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:03:25PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> [*] See address@hidden/tla-tools--devo--0/tla-file-log'.
>     (btw, do people find this notation for a particular file in an arch
>     archive intuitive?  I mean `the file called tla-file-log in the arch
>     revision address@hidden/tla-tools--devo--0')

Speaking for myself, yes: the arch namespace makes sense to me like this.
In my mind the -- could be as easily exchanged for : / or any number of
characters, the important thing is the (location)(item)(path) syntax.

But to bring up a chestnut: where is address@hidden published? It's
infuriating having the archive identifier but no way to map it to a physical
location ...

NB- yes, I can get it from aderuwe's mirror, but that doesn't help me find
the canonical source any more. Alexander, can you please bring back the
page which displayed the original URLs?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]