[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:03:14 +1000 |
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 01:38, Zack Brown wrote:
> That's a good point. But why is the name of the archive included in the
> category itself? It doesn't seem releavant, and if it weren't there then
> a straight 'mv' might have a hope of working.
It's context, consider it a fully qualified name. One doesn't branch
'devel' from 'main', one branches
'address@hidden/project--devel--1.2' from
'address@hidden/project--main--1.2'
that is, the archive is a non-removable aspect of revision id's, and
whenever you use shorthand, arch is adding it in.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Zack Brown, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Zack Brown, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] moving an archive, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15