[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:18:05 +0900
User-agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux)

>>>>> "Miles" == Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

    > $ tla logs   
    > address@hidden/smsparser--dev--0.3
    > address@hidden/smsparser--prod--0.2

    > And that's what I meant.

    Miles> That's not a list of logs... I agree that it's a useful
    Miles> function, but the command name should reflect what it
    Miles> prints. :-) I'm suggesting to use either `tla log-versions'
    Miles> or `tla logs --versions' to print the above info.

I find neither of those at all useful in figuring out what the command
prints.  "sources" comes closer, but I don't much like that, either.
"origins"?  "roots"?  "ancestors"?  "progenitors"?  "uncles"?  (I think
I'm getting too silly, I'll stop there.)

Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]