[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 21:24:33 +0900
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux)

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Hedderly <address@hidden> writes:

    Paul> I proclaimed one fact,

"Factoid."  I see no language in the Bitkeeper License prohibiting bug
reports and RFEs on competing SCMs.

    Paul> and then stated an observation on implications of the
    Paul> 'public' license for people involved in projects such as
    Paul> Debian (ie as a Debian Developer, I may not be allowed to
    Paul> use BK since Debian distribute 'competing' SCMs.)

There is no prohibition of distribution as such in the BKL.  And you
imply that you are an employee of the Debian Project.  Really?

    Paul> I can't see how I said anything defamatory, or untrue.

That doesn't surprise me.

Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]