|
From: | Aaron Bentley |
Subject: | [Gnu-arch-users] Commit -A |
Date: | Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:15:02 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 |
I just tried "tla commit -A address@hidden". I got: attempt to write directly to mirror archive: address@hidden mirror of: address@hidden The same happens if I use address@hiddenDoes anyone else feel that this is the wrong behavior? Is there an advantage that I don't see?
My expectation is for tla to locate the archive using the registered name, not the official one. If my my tree is up-to-date with the SOURCE archive, I'd expect the commit to go through, and if it's not, I'd expect it to die normally. Does that sound reasonable?
Aaron
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |