[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:04:00 -0500 |
On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 14:31, Tom Lord wrote:
> One nice thing about the way patch-logs currently work is that mkpatch
> and dopatch don't have to know anything (much) special about them.
> Merging creates (perhaps redundently) new files; reverting removes
> (perhaps redundently) old files.
It is nice and clean, but we have to face the fact that mkpatch/dopatch
have to treat some filenames specially; e.g. {arch}/=tagging-method.
There's absolutely no way around that. Once you see it that way,
treating the patch logs specially isn't really different.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] graphical merges, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Robin Farine, 2004/04/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fast commits, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fast commits, Miles Bader, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fast commits, Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fast commits, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fast commits, Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Fast commits, Robin Farine, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits,
Colin Walters <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Miles Bader, 2004/04/03