[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] changes should run tree-lint like commit

From: Bug Goo
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] changes should run tree-lint like commit
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 00:10:02 +0000

Created as bug 113

On Sun May 16 15:51:59 2004, Andrew Suffield wrote:

[Your message is attached]
Severity: wishlist

A common idiom is to run 'tla changes' before committing, to aid in
writing log entries and check the tree is in a suitable state. This
would be more useful if it called tree-lint in the same manner as
commit, so that it gives you a better summary of the state of the
tree. (Non-fatal warnings from tree-lint, at the start of a commit,
come too late to be useful).

I have lost count of the number of times that I've run 'changes' in an
implicit tree with 'untagged-source source', observed files being
added, and committed, only to find out that one of them doesn't have a
proper id tag.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' : |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Gnu-arch-users mailing list

GNU arch home page:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]