Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] [FEATURE-REQUEST] Caching mechanisme for patch-logs

[Matthieu Moy]

address@hidden (James Blackwell) writes:

>> $ tla library-add --log $revision
>
> I just poked around in one of my libraries, and it looks like we already
> have patchlogs stored in the libary.

Yes. It is both in

* The revision corresponding to the patch and

* All revisions containing a merge of this revision /except/ those
  having pruned their patch-log.

Having tla commands look in those places would already be nice, as you
said.

> However, it looks like revisions, abrowse and rbrowse don't know how to
> use libraries.

also "tla missing".

-- 
Matthieu