[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Patchlog Removed-files mentions explicit id-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Patchlog Removed-files mentions explicit id-tags
Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:55:02 +0000
Created as bug 191
On Tue Aug 17 09:26:39 2004, David Allouche wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:54:44AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> > > From: David Allouche <address@hidden>
> > > I have just found that when explicit id-tags are used, the patchlog
> > > header "New-files" does not mention explicit id-tags, but the
> > > "Removed-files" headers does mention them.
> > > I _can_ write a workaround for the inconsistence if the correct
> > > behaviour would be not to show explicit id-tags ever in patchlogs, so
> > I
> > > would like to know what _is_ the correct behaviour.
> > These headers are not heavily used. Their primary use is, for human
> > consumption (e.g., grep for a filename).
> > Therefore, I think, the explicit id files can be safely omitted from
> > the headers.
> Patchlog headers (especially Removed-files, but there might be other) SHOULD
> not mention explicit id-tag files.
> I'll implement a workaround in PyArch to filter-out explicit id tags in
> Removed-files listing.
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Patchlog Removed-files mentions explicit id-tags,
Bug Goo <=