Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Imminent 1.2.2 Release

[David Allouche]

On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 04:28 -0400, James Blackwell wrote:
> Nobody has notified me of any tla-1.2.2rc2 regressions in the last two
> weeks (including you over the last week), so 1.2.2 looks good to go.  As
> such, I'll be bundling and release 1.2.2 tomorrow night. So if there's a
> bug in 1.2.2rc2, now's the time to speak up

I have just found something that looks suspiciously like a regression in
get-changeset.

Basically, get-changeset now barfs if no default archive is set or given
on the command line, it does not barf 1.2, 1.2.1 and 1.2.2rc1. As
abentley puts it, it's a bad fix injection...

Sorry for finding that so late...

Attached: test case, output for 1.2.1 and 1.2.2rc2.

-- 
                                                            -- ddaa

method set: names
* creating category address@hidden/foo
* creating branch address@hidden/foo--bar
* creating version address@hidden/foo--bar--0
* imported address@hidden/foo--bar--0
* update pristine tree (address@hidden/foo--bar--0--base-0 => 
foo--bar--0--patch-1)
* committed address@hidden/foo--bar--0--patch-1
** tla version
tla 
address@hidden/dists--devo--1.0--patch-12(configs/emf.net-tla/devo.tla-1.2.1) 
from regexps.com
+ tla get-changeset address@hidden/foo--bar--0--patch-1 /tmp/tla-bugs-david/cset
** get-changeset suceeded

method set: names
* creating category address@hidden/foo
* creating branch address@hidden/foo--bar
* creating version address@hidden/foo--bar--0
* imported address@hidden/foo--bar--0
* update pristine tree (address@hidden/foo--bar--0--base-0 => 
foo--bar--0--patch-1)
* committed address@hidden/foo--bar--0--patch-1
** tla version
tla address@hidden/dists--gnuarch--0--patch-1(configs/candidate/tla-1.2.2rc2) 
from regexps.com
+ tla get-changeset address@hidden/foo--bar--0--patch-1 /tmp/tla-bugs-david/cset
arch: no default archive set
** get-changeset failed

get-changeset.sh
Description: application/shellscript