[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:29:17 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:25:07PM -0600, John A Meinel wrote:
> *However* the original poster was asking if we do "binary diff like
> Subversion", and SVN's claim to fame is that they do delta compression
> on binary files.
>
> So when you responded with "yes we do, it works perfectly the same as
> SVN." You were incorrect.
No, it does work just as well (and better) than svn.
> Actually, as far as stating that it should be called delta compression
> instead of binary diff goes against what I would consider the popular
> terminology.
You mean 'svn propaganda', not 'popular terminology'. Of *course*
their propaganda tries to confuse the terminology. Confusing users is
how marketing works.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, John A Meinel, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Andrew Suffield, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, John A Meinel, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, Andrew Suffield, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, John A Meinel, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin, John A Meinel, 2004/12/05