[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?

From: martin f krafft
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:39:29 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

also sprach Matthieu Moy <address@hidden> [2005.08.24.1002 +0200]:
> > Imagine 100 users. Imagine the pain. I want in-archive hooks!
> Then, why did you delete Method 1 and Method 2 ?

I am not acquainted with pqm yet and thus don't trust in its
abilities. Method 2 is clearly a bottleneck I would not want in my
projects of this size.

> Think of pqm as a centralized archive with a smart server. It's
> just not implemented in the same way (pqm is an extra layer, not
> in the core protocol), but it offers roughly the same service.

/me notes to do homework

martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; address@hidden
invalid/expired pgp (sub)keys? use as keyserver!
spamtraps: address@hidden
"if builders built buildings the way
 programmers wrote programs,
 then the first woodpecker that came along
 would destroy civilization."
                                                  -- gerald weinberg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]