|
From: | Quiliro Ordóñez |
Subject: | Re: [GNU-linux-libre] chromium not free? |
Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:50:05 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
El 23/03/11 10:25, crap0101 escribió:
Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 09.42 -0500, Quiliro Ordóñez ha scritto:Thank you very much people. I now have a clearer panorama. Can conclude (as of the info provided) that Debian and Ubuntu introduce a lot of files/licencing changes in Chromium that are not on the source of Chromium?I don't think debian/ubuntu introduce anything. the changelog posted by Rubén try to enumerate every licence/copyright notice found in the source, but most are marked as 'unknown' because they haven't (this not mean those files are not free by dafault, but probably needs to be checked out).
Thanks for the info Crap0101.
For example, two files marked as unknown: #-------# http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/base/third_party/purify/pure.h?view=markup #-------# /* * Header file of Pure API function declarations. * * (C) Copyright IBM Corporation. 2006, 2006. All Rights Reserved. * You may recompile and redistribute these definitions as required.
Does this mean you cannot have the freedom to modify this information file? If this is the case, then it is not free.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |