[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Not free complety software, why other support nonf
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Not free complety software, why other support nonfree os and related? umm extrano e ilogico..
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:07:51 +0200
> I have been researching and viewing the list of software that is not
> free (vague and poorly made from Ubuntu the most obvious to the naked
It was edited over 150 times on the last two years, with the help of 16
contributors. In any case, feel free to send your improvements.
> why that software compile and run most of them on windows and mac?
Because it is portable. Nothing related to the license.
> LibreOffice supports non-free formats!!!, and supports saving on
> them!!!, and its a great support too better in most cases!!!
Yeah, isn't it nice?
> I think that the list and policies that exclude software are
> extremely inflexible
Would you prefer them to be arbitrary?
, or rarely suitable for "someones"
> others .. *Libre office can support formats that are not free but
> firefox **can not do ii on **plugins? interesting !!!!! ohh well free
> hell yeah! for me or who?*
Formats are not programs, plugins are.
> Obviously, if windozers not used and download not reach/know them as
> software right?, so there is obviously a political/independient item
> here .. and smelling like convenience for relationship between
> developers and business negociates!!
Dunno what you are on about there.
> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> Cofundador de Venenux; debian based multimedia alike free only
> zealots users (oh well, i try but..too many free guidelines buahhh)
> creador de massenkoh linux; debian enhanchements for better up to date
> support on stable brand, including non-free soft.
That is just sad.