gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:25:39 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Linønut <address@hidden> writes:

> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> In article 
>> <address@hidden>,
>>  Tim Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> > > (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman, address@hidden, at his
>>> > > request. The "I" below is rms.)
>>> > 
>>> > Sure it is.
>>> > 
>>> > And I'm Tony Blair.
>>> 
>>> Do you have any particular reason to doubt him?  RMS is known to have 
>>> other people post for him.  RMS is known to know address@hidden 
>>> sufficiently well to have stayed at his house when visiting California.  
>>> address@hidden is a well-known contributor to GNU software of nearly 20 
>>> years.  The content of the post matches RMS' known positions.c
>>
>> ...and his other posts, such as his numerous postings to the TeX groups, 
>> come from Google, and some come from the same IP address that was used 
>> for this post here.
>
> Good for you, Dick Tracy.
>
> Like everyone else would have that information at hand.
>
> Like COLA and GMD haven't been scammed, spammed, and trolled before.
>
> I prefer to start out sceptical.
>
> Let RMS post himself.

To change the tune (but not the gist) of the hysterics of a
pseudonymous well-known troll?  Come off it.  Of course you would give
damn about the veracity of any source, including RMS himself.  Karl is
the president of probably the largest international user group for a
particular piece of free software (TeX).  Only a lunatic would think
he'd impersonate RMS.  But you are a self-proclaimed lunatic, anyway,
as expressed in your pseudonym behind which you hide.

Why should anybody bother about the insinuations of a troll?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]