Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>> 
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>> 
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> "IP" is not a legal term.
>> >
>> > Yeah.
>> >
>> > http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/ms-vs-eu/article-20060421.en.html
>> >
>> > <quote>
>> >
>> > For one thing, "intellectual property" is not a legal term that exists,
>> > as such, anywhere in the world.
>> >
>> > </quote>
>> >
>> > How come that
>> >
>> > http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~tron/opensource/node5.html
>> >
>> > says
>> 
>> Would you claim that this is the wording of a law?
>
> Why don't you google "No. 100-506, 102 Stat. 2538", for example?

Why should I?  It won't explain what "IP" you think is being sold at
cost zero.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum