Re: GPL: Does a conveyor's violation result in rights to users?

[Rui Miguel Silva Seabra]

Ter, 2007-03-27 às 13:56 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> Richard Tobin wrote:
> > 
> > In article <4608EFBB.788AF1E4@web.de>,
> > Alexander Terekhov  <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> > 
> > >Yada, yada, yada. As if "first sale" ("copyright exhaustion" in EU
> > >speak) were nonexistent not only in the GNU Republic but everywhere.
> > 
> > That would only allow you to transfer your copy, not make more copies.
> 
> The doctrine is commonly called "first sale," but the actual 
> parameters of the rule are specified in the statute and not some lay 
> reading of "first," "sale," or even "first sale."

You're still off topic. Everyone here knows about first sale. It's just
that what you say is not the case.

Get it? There's First Sale... There's distributing copies.

Everyone talks here about distributing copies and you talk about First
Sale as if it were the same thing. Were you ever explained what First
Sale is?

I know you can quote, but do you even read?

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente