[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2007 16:52:31 +0200 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
[...]
> Because the GNU GPL states so.
http://weblog.ipcentral.info/archives/2007/03/delusions_of_gr.html
<quote>
Whatever grandiose fantasies the FSF has about itself as a government,
possessed of authority to draft regulations, it is not. FSF is a private
body that has drafted a form contract. It does not get to into court and
enforce new meanings. Instead, on murky points, a judge will decide what
it means, and the FSF should lose.
And once the ambiguities are stripped out, there is not going to be much
left of the GPL...
</quote>
regards,
alexander.
- GPL question, Bilgehan . Balban, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24