[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD
From: |
Doctor Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:54:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 |
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:03:05 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>
> It protects the inventor from having others steal and profit from the
> invention.
Like freetards.
> I'm in complete agreement that the patent system is issuing too many
> trivial patents. There's a lot of crap patents out there. Google has
> patents on blowing air on the back of computer racks and patents on
> physically running network patch cables along a 19" rack mount cabinet. But
> this doesn't mean that I'm against valid patents.
That's how I feel.
The system needs a complete overhaul.
> I'm not against software patents any more then I'm against any valid and
> innovative patent. The problem with software patents is the same as what
> exists in just about every other patentable area... just about everything
> and anything is being patented.
I pretty much feel the same way.
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, (continued)
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Doctor Smith, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Hadron, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, ml2mst, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/22
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/22
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD,
Doctor Smith <=
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/21
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, RonB, 2009/03/21