[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compliance detection tool
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Compliance detection tool |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:16:57 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 4/16/2010 3:34 PM, RJack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
It will be "erroneous" when another court says it is.
>> Right now, it's a valid decision of a court.
The Supreme Court has already said it's erroneous.
Unfortunately for you, a Supreme Court decision of 1992
does not overrule a US Court of Appeals decision of 2008.
- Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- The birth of a virus scanner against the GPL virus, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Compliance detection tool, amicus_curious, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, John Hasler, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04