[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:30:37 -0400 |
Looking at the form of Debianâs Social Contract, its conciseness and
clarity, I was inspired to think about a few points that would summarize
GNUâs mission and workings in a way that would hopefully be rather
consensual among maintainers (Iâd like to draw attention to the six
headings, not necessarily on the detailed wording.)
Thoughts?
How is this different than what is already on the GNU web pages? The
GNU manifesto, the GNU maintainer guides, etc? This doesn't read like
a social contract, but more of a summary of what we already have --
that might be a good idea in itself but then we should call it as
that. It is also I think already part of what is sent out to new
maintainers, so I am sure what the value of this would be.
Proposal of a âGNU Social Contractâ
This document states the core commitments of the GNU Project to the
broader free software community. All current GNU package maintainers
have agreed to uphold these values.
What GNU maintainers agree to is very small, it is only to follow the
policies that we have. They don't need to go beyond that, which is
what "uphold" would imply.
* GNU licenses uphold user freedom
The GNU Project has designed software licenses to ensure developers
cannot strip off user freedom from GNU
softwareâ[[https://www.gnu.org/licenses/copyleft.html][âcopyleftâ
licenses]]. GNU software is distributed under the terms of these
licenses.
Not true, we have programs licensed under permissive licenses.
* GNU welcomes contributions from all and everyone
The GNU Project produces software for anyone to use, but also wants to
give everyone the opportunity to contribute to its effortsâbe it as
software developers, web masters, translators, speakers, system
administrators, or on any of the many tasks that contribute to GNU.
The Project welcomes everyone regardless of their gender, ethnicity,
sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal
characteristics. The GNU Project commits to providing a harassment-free
experience for all its contributors.
Why not link to the
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html ? It would be
better to cite that, since that is what we recoomend.
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes, (continued)
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes, Florian Weimer, 2019/10/30
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/31
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes, Mike Gerwitz, 2019/10/30
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/31
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/31
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Florian Weimer, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/10/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: A GNU âsocial contractâ?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/10/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract†?, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU âsocial contractâ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU "social contract", DJ Delorie, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU "social contract", Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU "social contract", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/31
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/27
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/27
- Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/27