[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Ruben Safir |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:26:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 10/28/19 2:41 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jean Louis, le lun. 28 oct. 2019 21:54:00 +0530, a ecrit:
>> Virgin joke is a joke
> Now that I have read about it, I can definitely say that it is a
> completely inappropriate "joke". Sure, it'll get a lot of people laugh.
> But it'll also get some people not at ease / ashamed, etc., which is
> just in line with that I wrote:
No it wouldn't. The implication is that any reference to human
sexuality is offensive and that is CRAP. Grow ups have no trouble with
this.
Show how it shames anyone over the age of 16 to talk about Emacs
virginity? NO ONE... no one human anyway. It is a bit anti-religious,
but Stallman is not my Rabbi (although they do look a bit alike)
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/_sMA1Zd6ZRqw/SOvjkVIqk_I/AAAAAAAACIg/AC-nNugSZ68/s400/Rav+Avraham+Schorr.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7b/Richard_Stallman_-_F%C3%AAte_de_l%27Humanit%C3%A9_2014_-_010.jpg/1200px-Richard_Stallman_-_F%C3%AAte_de_l%27Humanit%C3%A9_2014_-_010.jpg
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www.brooklyn-living.com
Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and extermination camps,
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Message not available
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Ruben Safir <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28
- GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/29
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes (was: A GNU “social contract”?), DJ Delorie, 2019/10/29
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/29
- Re: GNU project _does_ discriminate contributors by classes, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/30