[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Women and GNU and RMS (was Re: something else)
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Women and GNU and RMS (was Re: something else) |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:00:15 -0400 |
IMO, to regain control of our public image, I think we have to take some
explicit and public steps to disassociate the GNU project from RMS's
comments.
RMS's comments are unrelated to the GNU project and everyone in the
GNU project is be allowed to their personal opinions, that you are
promulgating a lie of what RMS never said doesn't help.
My perspective is that the GNU project's mission is to produce
high-quality software that is free for everyone to use, and we should
welcome contributions from anyone who wants to support that mission. We
certainly should not make affirming support for RMS's
non-free-software-related beliefs necessary for people to contribute to
the GNU project, or to take a GNU maintainer/leadership role. Nor
should there be any kind of personal loyalty oath to RMS involved in
being a GNU contributor or maintainer.
What is being suggested sadly, is the opposite -- that people have to
take a loyalty pledge to contribute or become maintainers.
Re: Women and GNU and RMS (was Re: something else), Federico Leva (Nemo), 2019/10/31
Re: Women and GNU and RMS (was Re: something else),
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: Support for RMS and criticism of the "bottom-up"/"social contract" power grab attempt., Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/31