[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Alexandre François Garreau |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Nov 2019 20:00:32 +0100 |
Le mercredi 6 novembre 2019 19:31:17 CET, vous avez écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I will reply once more, but it may be the last time in this thread. Please,
> Alexandre and others, if you wish to contribute, stop rambling and come to
> the point, and actually try to stick to a point that is raised and avoid
> going off on lengthy tangents that I (and probably others) have no time
> to read.
Sorry, I have this problem of being pretty verbose :/ it’s not intentional,
and on many places I indeed just resort to shut up (because otherwise I’m not
welcome anymore).
> How on earth do you end up associating "we welcome contributors"
Not this but “harassment-free”
> with
> "censorship", "exclusion", "banning", "feminism" or "feminism-agnosticism"?
Because harassment is often associated with sexism, and a policy to be
enforced need some action, as you state after:
> Notice that the social contract is a statement of principles. Clearly if
> we want to provide a harassment-free environment, some procedure will have
> to be decided at some point in time in case harassment occurs; but this is
> not the goal of this document.
> Of course you are free to send your stream of consciousness to this list,
> but if you wish to have an impact on the topic at hand, I would suggest to
> make concrete suggestions on wording, or paragraphs to remove or to add.
The subject contains a question mark, and I already previously spoke against
the very concept of a “GNU social contract”. I preferred not repeating myself
but as this may have been done to a different sub-thread I’m coming to think
Dora was right and with such lengthy discussions repetition unfortunately
becomes necessary…
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/02
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/05
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/05
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/11/05
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Alexandre François Garreau <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Brandon Invergo, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/06
- Concrete suggestions on how to make GNU more welcoming (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Brandon Invergo, 2019/11/07
- Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas Enge, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Jean Louis, 2019/11/07