[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?
|
From: |
Jason Self |
|
Subject: |
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2019 06:40:42 -0700 |
On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 15:36 +0800, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> In my day job, we have to use Debian in our commercial products. I
> understand Trisquel is still not ready for that case.
A broad exclusion that Trisquel isn't ready for "commercial products"
(whatever that means) seems a bit much. I'm not sure what your precise
use case is but Trisquel has been around for 12 years and has so far
shown to work just fine in all use cases I've heard.
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, (continued)
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, bendikker, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, bendikker, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/06
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?,
Jason Self <=
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/08
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/09/06
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Richard Stallman, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/04