Re: [GNUe] Re:Proposal for ITEM package

[malek]

Quoting Reinhard Mueller <address@hidden>:

> Am Die, den 23.11.2004 schrieb Paul T. Juckniess um 17:51:
> > >* price info more complex (base qty, min qty, max qty, min
> > >amount, max amount)
> >  - Min , max sounds like planning information.  Might be a base
> >    to default off of when adding different warehouses.
> 
> Yes, I agree with that.
> 
> > >* lot ifentification (lot number, expiry date)
> >  - Lot and expire date belongs with an inventory value wwhich 
> >    would not be in the item masters.
> 
> Ditto
> 
> > >* commodity classification (nature, cargo type, code)
> > >* hazardous item info
> > >* tax category / categories?
> > >* origin country
> >  - This is a real pain to deal with but this should also be associated
> >    with inventories
> 
> Here, I don't really see how this could be different within a specific
> item.

sales distribution channel??. think small international company that has to deal
with different laws and/or different pricing scheme (based on
region/country/whatever) (or i didn't understand the first comment. if so
sorry.)


> 
> > >* sales conditions
> >  - I'm thinking a pricing module?
> 
> Yes. However, many small companies work with only a single price (or at
> least a price that holds for the vast majority of cutomers), and they
> would possibly prefer to have *that* price in the main item record.
> 

yeah but even if you work with a single price, there are always cases where a
sales representative has dealt something different,  based on qty or whatever
one can come up with. so i think price determination module as standard is
mandatory even in small business cases.

lekma


> Just my 0.02 $CURRENCY
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Reinhard Mueller
> GNU Enterprise project
> http://www.gnue.org
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> No army can stop an idea whose time has come.
>         -- Victor Hugo, 1802-1885
>