[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Evan's tests
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Evan's tests |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:50:57 +0200 (CEST) |
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Evan Berggren Daniel wrote:
> Yeah, I got that part. What I'm wondering about is the fact that
>
> #? [1 B19|E19]
>
> won't match
>
> = 2 B19 E19
If you really got this line then you forgot the id in fron of the
gtp command to be evaluated.
> because there's no 1 to match. Should I just drop the 1, as in
>
> #? [B19|E19]
No, you always need the return code. Always use
[1 (B19|E19)]
if there are multiple ways to succed in an owl test without ko. Use
[2 (A19|B17)]
if there are multiple ways to succeed with KO_A,...
I am not sure what your intention is with the above #? line. Also I am
not sure whether you really got the above gtp response. Was that
owl_threaten_attack?
Arend