[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Evan's tests
From: |
Evan Berggren Daniel |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Evan's tests |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:58:46 -0400 (EDT) |
I'll just go with as you've said. I'm not sure what confused me earlier,
if it happens again I'll ask.
Thanks
Evan Daniel
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Arend Bayer wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Evan Berggren Daniel wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I got that part. What I'm wondering about is the fact that
> >
> > #? [1 B19|E19]
> >
> > won't match
> >
> > = 2 B19 E19
>
> If you really got this line then you forgot the id in fron of the
> gtp command to be evaluated.
>
> > because there's no 1 to match. Should I just drop the 1, as in
> >
> > #? [B19|E19]
> No, you always need the return code. Always use
> [1 (B19|E19)]
>
> if there are multiple ways to succed in an owl test without ko. Use
> [2 (A19|B17)]
> if there are multiple ways to succeed with KO_A,...
> I am not sure what your intention is with the above #? line. Also I am
> not sure whether you really got the above gtp response. Was that
> owl_threaten_attack?
>
> Arend
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnugo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>