[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :)
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
RE: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :) |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Sep 2002 20:34:42 +0200 (CEST) |
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Portela Fernand wrote:
> Two questions :
> - I don't see how to break down this step into smaller ones. Suggestions ?
> - In case we agree it must be done in one block, should I use some
> EXPERIMENTAL_xxxx define ?
Well if you send in a larger patch that works fine immediately, I don't
expect many complaints :) So it depends on how your patch works out, I
suppose -- if it breaks a lot of stuff, an EXP... define may of course
be useful (if only to easily keep track of the breakage).
Arend
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), (continued)
RE: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/12
- RE: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :),
Arend Bayer <=