[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] bug?
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] bug? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:32:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
Arend Bayer wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> > Gunnar Farneb�k wrote:
> > > Paul wrote:
> > > > Is it normal that `--level N' as specified in command line is
> > > > effectively ignored?
> > >
> > > Yes. If you are playing with time controls the --level setting is only
> > > used as initial value. Use --min-level and --max-level if you want to
> > > limit (or extend) the allowed range of levels.
> >
> > I think it is counter-intuitive. Maybe we should rename current level
>
> I agree it is counter-intuitive if you set --level 1, but it does
> exactly what you should expect if you set --level 12 (as far as my
> intuition is concerned).
In other words, you sort of propose to make `--level' an alias for
`--max-level'?
Paul