[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Status of to-be client 0.8x
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Status of to-be client 0.8x |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:39:04 -0700 |
On 2010-07-08, at 3:44 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Does that also happen with FreeDIAMS 0.3 ? If so it would be a bug.
I would have to go back to 0.3 to check
> In fact, even 0.4 should support the command line argument way of
> passing in names properly. If it doesn't that's a bug in either
> FreeDIAMS or GNUmed.
It may be neither, it may be just that 0.3 handled the entire name as a single
field whereas 0.4 handles it as name parts. So it would be more a version
incompatibility than a bug.
-- Jim
- [Gnumed-devel] Status of to-be client 0.8x, Jim Busser, 2010/07/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Status of to-be client 0.8x, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Status of to-be client 0.8x, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/07/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Status of to-be client 0.8x,
Jim Busser <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Status of to-be client 0.8x, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/07/09
- [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/07/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API, Jim Busser, 2010/07/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API, Eric MAEKER, 2010/07/10
- Message not available
- FreeDIAMS 0.4x API (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API), Jim Busser, 2010/07/10
- Re: FreeDIAMS 0.4x API (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API), Karsten Hilbert, 2010/07/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: FreeDIAMS 0.4x API (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API), Jim Busser, 2010/07/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: FreeDIAMS 0.4x API (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API), Eric Maeker, 2010/07/11
- Re: FreeDIAMS 0.4x API (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDIAMS 0.3 API), Jim Busser, 2010/07/11