[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond ! |
Date: |
Wed, 4 May 2011 23:29:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:54:59PM -0300, Rogerio Luz wrote:
> > - user starts GNUmed
> > - user activates Kirk
> > - user sees episode "Diabetes" with Diabetes ICD code
> > - user goes "WTF ?!? This episode is about hypertension !"
> > - user edits episode name to "Hypertension"
> >
> > At this time do you want to end up with the now-Hypertension
> > episode still having the Diabetes ICD code ?
> >
> >
> BIG YES ... although this is a good example
> - how about the user that goes to Kirk and says ... WTF I left that episode
> as DM because I was suspecting it at the time ... renames it again and we
> lose Hypertension.
OK. I understand. Likely, this behaviour is prone to debate
so it'll best be configurable.
> I preffer to make a coment on the EMR than to miss a diagnosis.
I am not sure I fully understand this statement, contextually.
> Could we
> (and this maybe a HUGE request) put a signal beside the code that it has
> been changed?
Hm, you want this to happen ?
- user enters "diabetes" episode without codes
- user edits "diabetes" episode adding a code
- user edits "diabetes" episode again adding a *second* code
-> do you want to see a signal ?
-> if so - what should it stand for ?
- user edits "diabetes" episode yet again, removing the first code
-> do you want to see a signal ?
-> if so - what should it stand for ?
- user removes all remaining codes from "diabetes" episode
-> signal or not ?
I probably did not quite understand what you mean.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2011/05/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Jim Busser, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2011/05/06
- [Gnumed-devel] Fwd: clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2011/05/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Jim Busser, 2011/05/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/05/06